<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alex Jacobson 3.0 &#187; Lets do what!?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexjacobson.com/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=6" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexjacobson.com</link>
	<description>Philosophy Finance Friends Science Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:30:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Against Data Portability</title>
		<link>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=270</link>
		<comments>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=270#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lets do what!?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexjacobson.wordpress.com/?p=270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saw this  advocacy of DataPortability over at Valleywag.   It is an idea only a programmer could love.  Real humans don&#8217;t want data portability.  As I told Joseph Smarr of Plaxo, when I go to BurningMan, I don&#8217;t necessarily want to interact with the same people I meet at tech conferences. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw <a href="http://valleywag.com/348646/what-is-data-portability">this</a>  advocacy of DataPortability over at Valleywag.   It is an idea only a programmer could love.  Real humans don&#8217;t want data portability.  As I told Joseph Smarr of Plaxo, when I go to BurningMan, I don&#8217;t necessarily want to interact with the same people I meet at tech conferences.  Every context has its appropriate ambient data and connections.  A flat world limits freedom.</p>
<p>Facebook initially got it right.  They created a place where people could feel free to express themselves in a particular context.  The feeling of security and privacy led to a flourish of content uploaded to the site. By opening up, now, if you are on Facebook, you have the risk that your mom or your employer is going to  see  the  photos your friends posted of your antics at the party last night.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.davidbrin.com/tschp1.html">transparent society</a> is a totalitarian society and thats not fun for anyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alexjacobson.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=270</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I am advocating wireless socialism at a new group blog: SpareInk.com</title>
		<link>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=266</link>
		<comments>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=266#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lets do what!?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexjacobson.wordpress.com/2005/06/29/i-am-advocating-wireless-socialism-at-a-new-group-blog-spareinkcom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check it out SpareInk.com.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check it out <a href="http://spareink.com">SpareInk.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alexjacobson.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=266</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big government something only a rich country can afford</title>
		<link>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=262</link>
		<comments>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=262#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jun 2005 17:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lets do what!?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexjacobson.wordpress.com/2005/06/19/big-government-something-only-a-rich-country-can-afford/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great interview from Nick Shulz  of William Lewis author of &#8220;The Power of Productivity, Wealth, Power, and the Threat to Global Stability.&#8221;about how poor countries become rich.  Its all about productivity and productivity is all about protecting the rights of consumers against producers.  Structuring a political system so that producer lobbyists don&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great <a href="http://techcentralstation.com/061705A.html">interview</a> from Nick Shulz  of William Lewis author of &#8220;<a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/sim-explorer/explore-items/-/0226476766/0/101/1/none/purchase/ref%3Dpd%5Fsxp%5Fr0/102-6094354-1160155">The Power of Productivity, Wealth, Power, and the Threat to Global Stability</a>.&#8221;about how poor countries become rich.  Its all about productivity and productivity is all about protecting the rights of consumers against producers.  Structuring a political system so that producer lobbyists don&#8217;t win control appears to be the key to success, but that turns about to be very difficult.  If you are at interested in any of any of these things, I strongly recommend you read the whole thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alexjacobson.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=262</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Software Outsourcing Skepticism</title>
		<link>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=260</link>
		<comments>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=260#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lets do what!?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexjacobson.wordpress.com/2005/06/13/software-outsourcing-skepticism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Friends know that for a while I have been skeptical about the whole software outsourcing to India story.  The real value in software is the connection with the customer/user and that can&#8217;t be outsourced.  Now Half Sigma does a really good job of generalizing the point:

But what is left for the United States [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friends know that for a while I have been skeptical about the whole software outsourcing to India story.  The real value in software is the connection with the customer/user and that can&#8217;t be outsourced.  Now <a href="http://www.halfsigma.com/2005/06/from_informatio.html">Half Sigma</a> does a really good job of generalizing the point:</p>
<blockquote><p>
But what is left for the United States to do if both manufacturing and information jobs are moved overseas? The answer is marketing. Marketing is the craft of linking producers of goods and services with customers. And the customers exist in the United States because we are the world&rsquo;s richest nation.</p>
<p>Only Americans know what other Americans want to buy. Only Americans know how to create the perception of value where none actually exists. Two days ago I wrote about an $88 t-shirt. The Chinese can manufacture a t-shirt for $1, but they will never be able to figure out how to get Americans to pay 88 times what it costs to manufacture.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alexjacobson.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=260</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can open source compete with integrated hardware?</title>
		<link>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=256</link>
		<comments>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=256#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 15:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lets do what!?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexjacobson.wordpress.com/2005/05/25/can-open-source-compete-with-integrated-hardware/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As hardware gets cheaper, more and more of the value comes from software and integration.  That is the Apple strategy (keeping the Mac closed) and it is not Microsoft&#8217;s strategy with the X/Box.  There is no room for open source in these models.  The only way for open source to compete is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As hardware gets cheaper, more and more of the value comes from software and integration.  That is the Apple strategy (keeping the Mac closed) and it is not Microsoft&#8217;s strategy with the X/Box.  There is no room for open source in these models.  The only way for open source to compete is to stay open from top to bottom and build an ecosystem around developers.  This is a variant of the Clayton Christiansen thesis.  As software and hardware get sufficiently cheap, value comes from integration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alexjacobson.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=256</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advice for Living One Thousand Years</title>
		<link>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=253</link>
		<comments>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=253#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 13:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lets do what!?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexjacobson.wordpress.com/2005/05/18/advice-for-living-one-thousand-years/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Sunday Times of London describes improvements in science that may eliminate aging as a cause of death.  Until they arrive, here are its points of advice.  Note: I think it is highly likely that there are different best options for different people so take this with a grain of salt.

1 Don&#8217;t even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Sunday Times of London <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2092-1522606,00.html">describes improvements in science</a> that may eliminate aging as a cause of death.  Until they arrive, here are its points of advice.  Note: I think it is highly likely that there are different best options for different people so take this with a grain of salt.</p>
<blockquote><p>
1 Don&#8217;t even think about smoking and, preferably, don&#8221;t hang glide.</p>
<p>2 Eliminate sugar to lower blood insulin levels. Use stevia as a sweetener. It is a South American plant that is both very sweet and good for you.</p>
<p>3 Don&#8217;t eat any animal fats. Government guidelies tend to say cut these down, but they probably only say this because they think it&#8217;s the best<br />
people can manage. No saturated fat at all is probably best.</p>
<p>4 Eat lots of vegetables that grow above ground. Those below ground are heavy in carbohydrates that turn into sugar and raise insulin levels.</p>
<p>5 Don&#8217;t overdo the fruit. Contrary to popular wisdom it&#8217;s not unconditionally good as it contains sugar. Non-drinking Arabs and Indians who<br />
sit around sipping orange juice all day end up with diabetes.</p>
<p>6 Eat nuts. For incompletely understood reasons, people who eat nuts live longer. Not salted peanuts, however (see 7).</p>
<p>7 Don&#8217;t salt things. Salt raises blood pressure and will kill you through a stroke or heart attack. For this reason, don&#8217;t touch processed food.</p>
<p>8 Don&#8217;t have heart bypass surgery or have a stent installed to hold a blocked artery open. Latest figures suggest neither works. People who live<br />
longer after them probably do so because the shock made them eat better and exercise more.</p>
<p>9 Have a massive medical assessment, preferably at Kronos in Phoenix, Arizona, to establish what you are doing wrong and, if possible, what genetic<br />
weaknesses you have. Continue these assessments throughout your life and adjust supplements accordingly. Read all the latest medical journals to keep<br />
up.</p>
<p>10 Exercise vigorously and daily but dont run. Running is bad for your skeleton.</p>
<p>11 Take a childs aspirin once a day to thin your blood and a much larger dose before you get on a plane. Ideally, don&#8217;t get on a plane.</p>
<p>12 Eat very little. Rats on restricted diets live longer but it is not known if this would damage humans  particularly their brains. So if you forget<br />
what 2+2 equals, eat more.</p>
<p>13 Ignore all of the above. They may be wrong and, if a piano falls on you, pointless.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alexjacobson.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=253</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stanley Fish gets it wrong</title>
		<link>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=252</link>
		<comments>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=252#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 12:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lets do what!?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexjacobson.wordpress.com/2005/05/16/stanley-fish-gets-it-wrong/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stanley Fish attempts to argue that there is no principled way to differentiate between Ward Churchil&#8217;s claims that the victims of 9/11 were &#8220;little Eichmans&#8221; and Larry Summers comments that the preponderane of males in Harvard&#8217;s physics department might be partially the result of genetic predispositions.  He claims that both sorts of speech are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://chronicle.com/temp/email.php?id=u0b5jordkad3q8ckshgcpd964cc6wy2w">Stanley Fish attempts to argue</a> that there is no principled way to differentiate between Ward Churchil&#8217;s claims that the victims of 9/11 were &#8220;little Eichmans&#8221; and Larry Summers comments that the preponderane of males in Harvard&#8217;s physics department might be partially the result of genetic predispositions.  He claims that both sorts of speech are equally permissible from a First Ammendment perspective and that it is inconsistent of the right to condemn Churchill and demand his resignation while at the same time making Larry Summers a free speech martyr.</p>
<p>Fish is largely missing the point.  Summers is making a factual claim that may or may not be justified using scientific evidence. See <a href="http://www.edge.org/documents/archive/edge160.html">this fabulous debate</a> to betwee Steve Pinker and Elizabeth Spelke to see how such a discussion can proceed.  In contrast, Churchill is making a value judgement about America and terrorism that is not per se provable or disprovable.  Discussion and evaluation of factual claims are the substance of science and acadamia and it is indeed scandalous that Harvard&#8217;s faculty appears unable to engage in it.  In contrast, Churchill is infusing facts with value judgements that at odds with those of the people and institutions that employ him.  The left has indeed been entirely ok with the politicization of academia.  The right has largely stood for the idea that academia should be the province of intellect.</p>
<p>Churchill&#8217;s abuse was to shift from intellectual discourse to political discourse and to represent his political discourse as intellectually valid.  Summers was making a factual hypothesis ammenable to proof or disproof.  The fact that Fish can&#8217;t see the difference is indeed part of the problem with academia today, a problem that Ward Churchill so vividly makes apparent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alexjacobson.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=252</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Current Email Solution (VAST IMPROVEMENT OVER BEFORE)</title>
		<link>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=244</link>
		<comments>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=244#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 15:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lets do what!?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexjacobson.wordpress.com/2005/05/05/current-email-solution-vast-improvement-over-before/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
CRM114 to filter spam.  I wrote a script that grabs all mail saved into teach-mail and teach-spam folders and uses them to improve CRM114.  The result has been a 95% drop in inbox spam with less than 1% false positives.  
All mail goes into my INBOX and stays there.  I bcc [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>CRM114 to filter spam.  I wrote a script that grabs all mail saved into teach-mail and teach-spam folders and uses them to improve CRM114.  The result has been a 95% drop in inbox spam with less than 1% false positives.  </li>
<li>All mail goes into my INBOX and stays there.  I bcc all outbound mail to myself.  I view my mail most recent first.  Now regular mail usage is compatible with POP and lots of other mail readers.  If a mail needs to be processed then it can be saved into a folder.  But following the philosophy of Dave Allen&#8217;s Getting Things Done, I only check email when I am ready to process it.  Any mail that I can answer quickly I do.  Any other mail that requires a larger response gets put on a todo list.  Using your inbox as a TODO list is just a recipe for trouble.</li>
<li>All bulk messages are delivered to a bulk folder that I can check when I anm ready to read random news broadcast.  Email in my INBOX gets presumptive priority.  The result is a much lower aggregate interrupt level.  I created a cron job that grabs all the <em>from:</em> addresses from a teach-bulk folder and adds them to a buklist.  See <a href="http://www.beedub.com/cgi-bin/wiki.cgi/27">here</a> for info on how.  My procmail filter looks like this<br />
<code>:0 Whic :$BULKLIST$LOCKEXT<br />
| (formail -x received: -x X-Envelope-From: -x from: -x sender: -x reply-to: -x<br />
return-path:| fgrep --quiet --ignore-case --file=$BULKLIST)<br />
#<br />
:0 Wa<br />
AAADailies<br />
</code><br />
Note: From enumeration appears to be the best way to do this.  Custom addressing doesn&#8217;t help enough.
</li>
<li>I set my email client to check for new email ever hour rather than every minute.  That is also a vast reduction in distraction.</li>
</ul>
<p>All of these changes have made me gigantically less distracted and hopefully more productive.  Yay!<br />
Update: A sideeffect of a consistent inbox is that I now have things configured so that all from addresses of mail accepted in my INBOX are whitelisted.  Note if you use CRM114, you should only whitelist AFTER training.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alexjacobson.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=244</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simple Entitlement/Tax Reform</title>
		<link>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=237</link>
		<comments>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=237#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 14:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lets do what!?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexjacobson.wordpress.com/2005/05/03/simple-entitlementtax-reform/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NoSpeedBumps proposes:

 &#8211; Begin mandatory Retirement Savings Accounts (RSAs) and phase out Social Security
 &#8211; Begin mandatory Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) and achieve universal health care coverage, phase out Medicare and Medicaid
 &#8211; Implement a loophole-free Effective Flat Tax (EFT) that has a completely flat perceived rate

Read the whole thing to understand why this is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://nospeedbumps.com/?p=77">NoSpeedBumps proposes:</a></p>
<ol>
<li> &#8211; Begin mandatory Retirement Savings Accounts (RSAs) and phase out Social Security</li>
<li> &#8211; Begin mandatory Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) and achieve universal health care coverage, phase out Medicare and Medicaid</li>
<li> &#8211; Implement a loophole-free Effective Flat Tax (EFT) that has a completely flat perceived rate</li>
</ol>
<p>Read the whole thing to understand why this is actually very progressive and very much saner than our current system.</p>
<p>Philosophically I prefer taxing estates to taxing income, but that is a subject of another post.  If we are going to stick with income, this is a good way to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alexjacobson.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=237</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Email Handling Experiment: NO FOLDERS</title>
		<link>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=235</link>
		<comments>http://alexjacobson.com/?p=235#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 12:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lets do what!?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexjacobson.wordpress.com/2005/05/03/new-email-handling-experiment-no-folders/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently shifted my email processing to storing all my already processed email is an archive folder (rather than lots of special purpose folders).
Now that I have reduced my incoming spam by 95%, I am trying a new inbox experiment.

View email recent first
BCC all outgoing mail  into my inbox
leave all email in my inbox
note [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently shifted my email processing to storing all my already processed email is an archive folder (rather than lots of special purpose folders).<br />
Now that I have reduced my incoming spam by 95%, I am trying a new inbox experiment.</p>
<ul>
<li>View email recent first</li>
<li>BCC all outgoing mail  into my inbox</li>
<li>leave all email in my inbox</li>
<li>note a set of processed email by sending myself a STOP POINT message</li>
</ul>
<p>If this works, I will no longer be dependent on IMAP.  I&#8217;ll be able to do useful searching and sorting with whatever mail client I want.  And I will spend even less time &#8220;managing my email&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also, I set my email polling interval to check for new email every hour rather than every minute.  That leads to a much higher level of sanity.  I may start switching all my subscription email to a different folder and then increase the polling frequency.  We&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://alexjacobson.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=235</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
